In these early commentaries it is particularly telling that serious cuts are being made to mental health services in the face of current empty government promises to focus on improving those services. it is suggested here, and I would support it, that this is because mental health services, as has been the case throughout the preceding centuries, come very much last on the healthcare lists and government money intended for mental health is frequently illicitly used for other purposes by local NHS trusts, especially PCTs.
I HOPE THE PROFESSIONALS, THE CLINICIANS AND THOSE TRAINING THEM ARE ABLE TO TAKE NOTE.
Comprehensive official information about the Mental Health Bill, its history, the Joint Parliamentary Committee's report and the government's response to that can be found on the Department of Health's mental health information page. and a copy of the Genevra Richardson Expert Committee's 1999 Report can be found here.
A document I recently unearthed from dust covered shelves is one I find fascinating. The Great Debate was written by Larry Gostin, a human rights in mental health hero, and published by MIND in 1982. It is about the reform of the Mental Health Act 1959 and fascinating in how much some of the issues (under different terminology) parallel those arising out of the present Mental Health Bill debate. The Great Debate is also a good example of how positive mental health legislation can be built.
Combining a timely, plain english comparison to the legislation proposed for England and Wales, The well written Scots leaflet The Mental Health Act, What's it all About? A Short Introduction shows how Scotland has adopted important Genevra Richardson (and indirect Larry Gostin) principles such as "reciprocity" and "informal care". Just what is so different here that we should have inferior legislation?